The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on unlawful gaming.

No, they weren't personally in presence, but the world-famous stars were conspicuously consisted of in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes casinos - the controversial sites offering both complimentary casino-style games and rewarding prizes, such as cash, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'play for complimentary,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are just two cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now discovers itself besieged by suits. In the eyes of numerous video gaming corporations, not to mention suit complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos serve as traditional gambling establishments, just without the oversight, consumer securities and tax laws. So not only can they prevent the high 24-percent federal gaming levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulatory difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in income last year alone. Now the business deals with accusations of illegal sports betting in a New york city claim that claims VGW uses celeb endorsers to 'produce a veneer of legitimacy' around its item. (See VGW's declaration listed below)

'I'm uncertain" if you don't trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies operating multibillion-dollar unlawful operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's presenter, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of celebrities from gambling enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, along with NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom provide any differences in between standard gaming and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among numerous sweepstakes casinos found online

Ryan Seacrest prompts fans to play at Chumba Casino, where many - however not all - video games are complimentary

Drake has an offer with social sweeps casino, Stake, that he regularly touts on social media

Find out more

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements typically focus around the social element of the casinos, while omitting the potential for actual gambling losses.

Others tempt customers with guarantees of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media ad revealing off Drake's vehicles, airplanes and mansions before pivoting to video of the rap artist playing online casino-style games.

'Daddy, why do we have so much money?' read the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption explained: 'Because I never gave up.'

The discrepancy between sports betting sites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit complex, however operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the previous.

A representative for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), discussed its members are not in direct competitors with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, the majority of the players on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are playing for complimentary.

'Most social sweeps consumers never make a purchase,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of customers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller sized than the normal deposit or wager size at real-money online gambling websites.'

Social casinos provide clients a chance to play casino-style games with buddies. Players have the alternative to buy worthless currency often referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged for real money, however can be utilized to unlock numerous features within the video games.

But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes video gaming, allowing customers to get other currency referred to as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other rewards.

And therein lies the capacity for financial losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One gamer informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the past year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting an International Poker event

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an advertisement flaunting Drake's vehicles, airplanes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are banned in all however 7 states, which has assisted to fuel the popularity of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not need generally require identification. However, websites like Chumba will request IDs from players attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, allow consumers to submit mail-in requests for free sweeps coins, offered the players follow painfully specific instructions. What's more, players are often rewarded with sweeps coins simply for registering, thus giving them a reason to try their hands at any variety of gambling establishment video games for an opportunity to win - or lose - genuine cash.

So why are sweepstakes sites allowed to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are prohibited in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the free casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is simply a means of promoting their bread and butter.

'Social sweepstakes games are merely a type of online home entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is needed to play at social gambling establishments with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never ever need to spend for a chance to win prizes. That lack of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is an important difference between social sweeps and conventional online gambling websites like casinos.'

Consider the manner in which McDonald's utilizes its yearly Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, but rather they're purchasing hamburgers and french fries that offer them the opportunity to win financially rewarding prizes, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the video game itself does not meet the meaning of sports betting in the US.

'Sweepstakes are a long-standing method for promoting all type of everyday services in the United States, everything from burgers to publication memberships to coffee and home enhancement stores,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are regularly used by a who's who of household names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to many sports betting market experts, that argument doesn't cut it.

For starters, video gaming attorney Daniel Wallach mentions, McDonald's Monopoly game doesn't run indefinitely. Rather, it has a well-defined start and end, consequently recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote genuine products like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They do not last forever and they're generally not tied to casino-style games of possibility,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're just money free gifts.

'The sweepstakes [casinos] possess none of the characteristics frequently associated with McDonald's-design sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes casinos offer" casino-like" payments, generally 80 percent or more of earnings, whereas the normal payment percentage for a temporary advertising sweepstakes is a minor share of the revenue earned by the business [typically less than one percent]'

Wallach fasts to liken the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the web coffee shops that sprang up in Florida, using customers the opportunity to play casino-style video games for real rewards. A number of those brick-and-mortar establishments have actually considering that been shuttered over accusations of unlawful gambling.

DJ Khaled is amongst numerous star spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments need to deal with similar scrutiny.

'These distinctions are not arbitrary,' Wallach said of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have actually consistently been pointed out by courts and state attorney general of the United States as key consider figuring out that a sweepstakes promo was in reality a guise for illegal sports betting.'

Among the casino industry's leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pushing legislators to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in some cases, enact new legislation on the issue.

'Consumers are being denied of defenses and states are passing up considerable tax and revenue chances as this gaming replaces that performed through controlled channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the complainants who have sued social gambling establishments in more than a lots states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 separate cases in Kentucky without confessing any misdeed, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW concurred to pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, stating the settlement was made to avoid legal costs and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the latest lawsuit, which is mostly comparable to its predecessors, New york city state homeowners Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'prohibited sports betting business. '

Apple and Google have likewise been called as offenders in suits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company responded to DailyMail.com's ask for comment.

'We normally don't talk about matters before the courts,' a VGW representative informed DailyMail.com via e-mail. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has only just been filed with the court and VGW has not been formally served.

'We have complete self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and guidelines where we operate, and remain confident about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to provide our free-to-play games throughout the majority of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a years, developing not just fantastic games, user experiences and home entertainment, but likewise guaranteeing this is done securely, responsibly and at the greatest level of standards.

'More broadly, we 'd reiterate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are relatively typical across the online social games industry (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we intend to strongly defend any claim which may be brought against us.'

The issues in between traditional online gambling and sweepstakes casinos might show bothersome for some star endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with conventional gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's ironic that expert athletes are hawking prohibited sports betting 'sweeps' websites while at the very same time the leagues desire to project a strong position against illegal gambling - especially when attempting to tamp down the occasional sports betting scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was simply eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time restriction from the NBA over allegations he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unrelated to anything including social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being taken legal action against for hosting supposedly unlawful sports betting sites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a significant concern for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on professional athletes backing sweepstakes websites refers when, not if,' Glaser added.

Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the gamers' agents responded to DailyMail.com's ask for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also disregarded to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have a responsibility to discuss to consumers the distinctions and resemblances in between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW insisted there is nothing more that requires to be done.

'We have complete self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our company practices more broadly,' the representative said. 'A few of our values are" our players precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of whatever we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes sites, sees things differently.

'Celebrities who lend their names to dubious prohibited gaming sites are, at a minimum, putting their reputations at threat as well as courting civil and class actions by consumers who declare harm,' Glaser said. 'There is likewise some danger that state regulators and state chief law officers rope celebrity endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in prohibited gambling.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton